Showing posts with label art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art. Show all posts

Saturday, 19 December 2020

The Wrong Question


My daughter dabbed and swiped, occasionally 

changing brushes. The arc of her hand 

seemed effortless but deliberate. I watched 

as the painting took on form and colour but I 

could not yet discern a meaning.


I left and returned some time later to find a 

spectacle that engrossed me. My eyes roamed 

the canvas looking for the focal point. I knew 

it was telling me something but I did not know 

what it was. “What is it meant to be”, I asked.


Oh Dad, you are asking the wrong question”, my daughter replied. 

What do you want it to be?


MDC December 2020




Saturday, 25 May 2019

Of Prosody and Verse


Of Prosody and Verse

What does a person who regularly reads poetry look like?

Do they wear linen and silks, and always take time with their appearance? Do they
give preference to the artistic and the aesthetic? Do they always have a vase of fresh
flowers in their rooms? Do they choose unusual taste combinations when ordering
from a menu? Do they complete studies in the arts at an ivy league university? Do
they seek the esoteric and the sublime? Do they always possess presence of mind
and are they always in tune with their inner thoughts and feelings?

Did they always think that poetry was important? Do they realise some truth about
poetry that an ordinary person does not? Do they consider that there is always at least
one poem in an anthology worthy of respect, if not joy?

Can ordinary people like poetry? Like it enough to look with eagerness for it in the
magazines they read, or to purchase a book or two of poetry that they occasionally
take down from the bookshelves to read? Ordinary enough that their bookshelves are
overflowing with the pulp fiction that is so easily obtained, and so difficult to refuse, but
are equally happy to have a small volume of poetry sitting amongst all these other
titles? Ordinary enough that their friends don’t know they like poetry?

I like poetry, but I feel ordinary. I dislike about fifty percent of the poetry I read; either I
don’t understand it or it’s too obtuse, or it is simply too aphasic for taste. Much of the
rest leaves me unmoved. I don’t dislike it, but it does nothing for me. I feel nothing. Did
the poet feel anything when he/she wrote it? Isn’t poetry supposed to move me, make
me think about the topic differently, improve my perception of life in general, give me a
new glimpse into a field I thought I already knew? Only a small portion of the poetry I
read moves me, makes me sit up and take notice. It makes me stop and think and
often sends me off into the realms of thought that are deep and too seldom visited.

And what does a poet look like? Most biographies of the life of bards I have read
indicate that they were closet poets until the weight of their work could no longer be
hidden. Did they hide themselves because they were ashamed of being a poet,
embarrassed over the quality of their writings, fearful of mockery and ridicule? Do we
expect a poet to produce simple, even mundane, thoughts wrapped in a beautiful
conception, a delightful artistry, while at the same time dressing carelessly, living
poorly, and enduring a life of deprivation and penury?

Poetry is a mystery to me. I feel it has a lofty mission but is that really the case? And
what, exactly, might that elevated purpose be? Surely it must be more than mere
linguistic synthesis. I hope that it is more than trite re-articulation using pentameter or
iambic structure. I don’t mind careful interpretation being a requisite commitment to
appreciate what the poet is declaring, but wilful obfuscation and obtuseness cannot
be condoned. Impenetrability is not the measure of good communication let alone a
work that should, at least in part, inspire, inform, or edify.

The poetry that I like, the poetry that inspires me, informs me, and edifies me, makes
my life richer. I look for the aesthetic beauty it brings to my day, and I enjoy the way it
furnishes my thoughts with deeper meanings and understandings. But clearly, a very
large portion of the world’s population do not think the same way. I doubt more than
ten percent of my friends and family could give two hoots about poetry. Even less
would go out of their way to read a poem. The thought of spending hard-earned
money to purchase a book of poetry never arises in their mind, and if ever it did, it
would be immediately discarded as either wasteful or extravagant.

I wonder, is poetry a metaphor for how we live? We, each, ascribe different weights
and measures to things in accordance with a subconscious world view, and that is
what makes the world multicultural. Some of which is good, and some which is terrible
from almost any perspective. Will there be poetry in Heaven? Will only the same ten
percent give a hoot, and will heavenly community poetry nights eek out a sparse
existence for lack of attendance?

You know, there are many, many things in this life that puzzle me, and no doubt, there
are many more important things to wonder about than where poetry sits in the
collective subconscious of our society, but I cannot help myself. I think about this far
more often than even I think is useful. What do you think?








Sunday, 11 March 2018

The Cost of Creativity

The cost of creativity is born by few while being enjoyed by the many.
More than material cost or financial cost is the personal cost paid by the artist
Knowing aforehand that they will follow their creativity
regardless that fortune and satisfaction will likely avoid them
Bound to their gift like a slave in chains
even though they feel freedom is not a choice available to them
Unwillingly accepting the inherent emotional risks
that are part and parcel of a creative life


Enduring for long seasons at the hand of their endowment
Undone by their gift, dying a little with the production of each work
And yet renewed a little by success, should it choose to come,
such recompense being elusive and fleeting.
And should success, wealth and fame present themselves
To then have to avoid the so easily stumbled upon offenses
of arrogance, conceit, narcissism, and pomposity.
Resolved that their artistry always leads to anguish
Either via the path of disappointment and exhaustion
Or the flame of fame and adoration.

Perceiving that humanity may be willing to adore their works
But not consider it important enough to purchase
That they will bemoan the poor state of funding by governments,
selfish procurement by corporations and
opportunistic acquisition by the wealthy
but make no effective step towards personal cost
in order to enrich their own lives, endow enterprise with pleasant environment,
or even to maintain the aesthetic culture of society.

For this reason, it is rare to find a truly creative person that is
Free without being wild
Expressive without being excessive
Unrestrained without being intemperate
Solitarian without being reclusive
Melancholy without being saturnine

Can we blame them when
Their solitude turns them into an eremite
Their ill-humour into moody antagonism
Their indiscriminate sins into public excesses
And their attempts at amelioration
produces alcoholic manic-depressives

We approve when a corporation commences an expensive re-engineering of itself
in order to better serve its customers.
We demand that politicians commit to a higher calling than their personal betterment.
We applaud when a sportsman lives on the poverty line in order to reach his goal.
We admire the mother who goes without in order to give to her children.

Why then do we observe with disapproval the artist who gives to the point of emotional bankruptcy for the very thing that brings purpose to themselves and amenity to the world?

MDC
March 2018

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

Art for art's sake ...

Local artist, Cathy McClelland, recently tweeted that she had sold her Tabletop Mountain to a private Sydney art collector.

Prolific is not a word you can use to describe Cathy's work. No, better words would be exceptional, notable and remarkable. Stand on the escarpment on almost any morning in Spring or Autumn and the view of the real article will be little different to this masterpiece of poise and accuracy.

Unlike that popular 70's song by 10cc which had the lyrics of "Art for art's sake, money for God's sake" Cathy continues her habit of producing low numbers of exceptional quality. I don't know what Cathy sells her paintings for; I suspect I will never be able to afford one, but one thing I do know is that Cathy is not driven by the money. She paints because she loves to, and her care for her subject is evident in every brush stroke and palette knife dab.

Enjoying both national and international acclaim, Cathy's work is quintessentially Australian, supported by a technically adept and consummate talent . You can check out her paintings at https://www.facebook.com/cathymcclellandfineart.com.au